Does reliance on advice from a lawyer constitute officially induced error of law?

Ontario, Canada

The following excerpt is from R. v. Haddad, 2008 ONCJ 486 (CanLII):

He also noted that other types of advice have been considered in the cases dealing with this excuse, for example, advice from lawyers and reliance on judicial pronouncements. However, he refused to comment on whether these types of advice might provide a basis for the excuse, since it was not applicable to the case before the court. Nevertheless, earlier in his judgment, he did note that while officially induced error first emerged in American jurisprudence in 1949 in the case of Long v. State, 65A, (2d), 489 (Del), that the American cases had since backed away from reliance on the advice of a lawyer as a form of officially induced error of law.

Other Questions

What is the defence of Officially Induced Error of Law? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a judge have to establish due diligence in reaction to an officially induced error of law? (Quebec, Canada)
Is a lawyer who is not a lawyer able to function in a non-legal capacity to provide solicitor-client advice? (Alberta, Canada)
Does a lawyer who holds corporate records constitute a lawyer for the corporation? (Alberta, Canada)
Does a refusal by the judge to appoint a lawyer for the accused constitute sufficient to warrant a new trial? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a client waive privilege over the legal advice given to them by their lawyer regarding a real estate transaction? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a lawyer’s client entitled to have all communications made with a view to obtaining legal advice kept confidential? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for error in judgment in a motion brought by a lawyer in a personal injury action? (Ontario, Canada)
Does an error in judgment in judgment constitute negligence? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review of a finding that there had been no erroneous advice or administrative error? (Canada (Federal), Canada)