How has the abuse of process doctrine been interpreted?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Briggs v. Durham Regional Police Services, 2019 HRTO 565 (CanLII):

The abuse of process doctrine is an equitable doctrine about the overall fairness of the judicial process. How the parties act or fail to act is a valid and necessary consideration to whether there was an abuse of process. The respondents' failure to take steps to prevent litigation was considered by the court in Arcand v. Abiwyn Co-operative Inc., 2010 FC 529 (“Arcand”).

Other Questions


In what circumstances will an arbitrator be bound to follow the interpretation of Arbitrator Starkman’s interpretation of the Interpretation of the Arbitrator's Interpretation in a dispute? (Ontario, Canada)
Can the doctrine of abuse of process be relied upon by persons who were not parties to the previous litigation? (Ontario, Canada)
How does the doctrine of abuse of process apply? (Ontario, Canada)
Can the abuse of process doctrine be used to prevent relitigation of issues that could have been determined? (Ontario, Canada)
When will the courts turn to the doctrine of abuse of process to determine whether relitigation should proceed? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for the doctrine of abuse of process in res judicata? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the doctrine of abuse of process apply to medical malpractice cases? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the range of damages for physical and sexual abuse suffered by children as a result of physical abuse? (Ontario, Canada)
When will the court grant relief under the Fletcher doctrine under the Rylands v. Fletcher doctrine? (Ontario, Canada)
Is it an abuse of process for an applicant to seek to raise allegations that were the subject of a settlement agreement? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.