Is there any case law where a plaintiff's version of events makes no sense?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Vo v. Michl, 2012 BCSC 1417 (CanLII):
The court was also referred to Bathgate v. Korolek, 2010 BCSC 37. In that case the court found the plaintiff’s version of events “makes no sense”, that her vehicle was not hit from behind, but rather the plaintiff turned her vehicle into the defendants vehicle.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the standard of proof required for a plaintiff to prove that a hypothetical event occurred at the same time as an actual event? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review applied by the Court of Appeal in determining the apportionment of fault between a plaintiff and plaintiff? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to an award for costs of future care for a plaintiff who was injured in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a plaintiff obtain a copy of a solicitor’s file from the solicitor's personal information for the purposes of making a will? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there a need for physical or temporal proximity between a plaintiff and plaintiff in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a plaintiff have to prove past events such as negligence on a balance of probabilities? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the Conseil Scolaire need to consider making the parents plaintiffs in the broader action? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a defendant in a separate action with the same plaintiff receive costs from 7 days after making a joint payment into court of a similar amount? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a plaintiff to prove that there is a real and substantial possibility of a future event leading to income loss? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to be treated as a thin-skulled plaintiff for the purpose of damage assessment? (British Columbia, Canada)
