How have courts considered customary practices in the context of a negligence action?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Joyce v. Canadian Pacific Hotels Corporation, 1994 CanLII 9088 (AB QB):

In Waldick v. Malcolm Iacobucci J. comments on customary practices, indicating that where an alleged custom is raised, the party who relies on the custom bears the onus of proving that the custom is in effect. He goes on to indicate that proof of a custom is not necessarily decisive against a determination of negligence. "[N]o amount of general community compliance will render negligent conduct 'reasonable … in all the circumstances' " [p. 473]. He concludes that "… the existence of customary practices which are unreasonable in themselves, or which are not otherwise acceptable to courts, in no way ousts the duty of care owed by occupiers …" [p. 474].

Other Questions


How have courts considered the doctrine of resulting trusts in the context of a dissolution of a marriage? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances have courts considered “probanda” estoppel in the context of proprietary estopplement? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is considered to be "gross negligence" in the context of medical malpractice cases? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
How have courts dealt with the issue of negligence in the context of personal injury cases? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts considered the credibility of the evidence in the context of a loan application? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have courts considered the concept of a "floating trust" in the context of a grant of the residue of an estate to the surviving spouse for her own use absolutely? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts considered findings of fact in the context of an evidentiary hearing? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of care required for an expert to be considered in a negligence action? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts in England and Canada considered the tortious measure of damages in an action for misrepresentation? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the courts considered opinion evidence in the context of an appeal? (British Columbia, Canada)