The recent case of Beland v. Hill [2012] O.J. No. 3997, deals with the ongoing obligation of a party to disclose. In that case, there was no surveillance evidence at the time of examination for discovery but subsequently surveillance evidence was obtained. In the Beland case, the court followed the rationale of “full and timely disclosure” as set out in Ceci v. Bonk. In dealing with the defendants failure to disclose the surveillance information and veterinary records, Mr. Justice Howden in Beland, makes the following observations from paragraphs 48 to 52:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.