Is a lump sum payment to compensate for economic disadvantage arising from the breakdown of the marriage?

Saskatchewan, Canada


The following excerpt is from Morton v. Morton, 1993 CanLII 8850 (SK QB):

It is usually inappropriate to award a lump sum payment to compensate for economic disadvantage arising upon the breakdown of the marriage (this is particularly so in the case of a long-term marriage); it is appropriate to consider economic disadvantage as a factor in an award of periodic support: Elliot v. Elliot, supra.

Other Questions


What is the meaning of the words “the marriage of the testator” and “made in contemplation of the marriage” in the Marriage of the Testator? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What constitutes desertion on the basis of an irreconcilable marriage breakdown? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for marriage to be held in a civil marriage? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court take notice of economic disadvantage to a spouse who has been absent from the workforce for a lengthy period? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have the courts dealt with the issue of traditional marriage in the context of maintenance and/or traditional marriage? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In a common-law marriage between Indians living on a reserve, can a common law marriage be valid? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have courts dealt with an application for an order quashing a resolution approving payment of legal expenses? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is a conditional gift in restraint of marriage valid? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
If a banknote is not presented for payment, can the maker of the note be held liable? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the reason why the court should be alert to detect and turn back attempts, to bring petitions under s. 3(d) of the Marriage and Divorce Act? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.