What is the procedure in which there have been no examinations for discoveries and no cross-examination on the affidavits?
Yukon, Canada
The following excerpt is from Ross River Dena Council v Yukon (Government of), 2015 YKSC 45 (CanLII):
In the case at bar, there were no examination for discoveries and no cross-examination on the affidavits filed. In other words, it has been a “just, speedy and inexpensive determination” of the proceeding on its merits. The procedure has been expeditious being heard in two days rather than days or weeks of discovery and oral evidence at trial. It is the same procedure as used in RRDC #1 and Beckman v. Little Salmon/Carmacks First Nation, 2010 SCC 53.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In a personal opinion in an affidavit, is it permissible to include personal opinions in the affidavit? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the proper procedure for assessing evidence that may or may not support a claim of lien? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the proper procedure for determining whether an unequal division of family assets is appropriate? (Yukon, Canada)
How has the substantial and unreasonable component of the test been interpreted? (Yukon, Canada)
How have the reasons of a tribunal decision been interpreted by chambers judges? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the test for a written resignation? (Yukon, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the meaning of the word “proceeding” in the context of the English Limitation Act? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the test for unjust enrichment in the law of constructive trust? (Yukon, Canada)
What threshold condition must be met to vary a custody order? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on physician negligence? (Yukon, Canada)
