There is a line of authority suggesting that it may. The leading case is Kozack v. Richter, [1974] SCR 832, (1973), 1973 CanLII 166 (SCC), 20 C.B.R. (NS)223. In that case, a creditor obtained a judgment against the bankrupt for injuries resulting from a motor vehicle accident. The bankrupt, notwithstanding he had a large family and a modest income, was ordered to pay fifty cents on the dollar as a condition of his discharge. The principle articulated, as stated at page 226 in the C.B.R., is: “ . . . the Act was never intended to enable a judgment debtor to get rid of a judgment for damages and with no other purpose to serve than the convenience and comfort of the debtor.”
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.