What is the relevant case law in the context of a full hearing of an interim access claim?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Nielson v. Kroetsch, 1996 CanLII 8688 (ON CJ):
[33] The case law submitted by the respondent parents for my consideration was, with one exception — Gallant v. Jackson, supra — decided in the context of a full hearing of an access claim. That did not detract from the value of the principles expressed in those cases. It did, however, lend a “hardness” to the principles that, in my estimation, is inappropriate at an interim stage of a proceeding.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What relevance does relevance exist in the context of relevance? (Ontario, Canada)
Is the conduct of a defendant in soliciting opt-outs before the certification hearing relevant to fixing the costs of a certification hearing? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a plaintiff's new statement of claim that describes the nature of their employment contract relevant to a whistleblowing claim? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for relevance of evidence in the context of "relevance"? (Ontario, Canada)
How has the BCSC considered the relevance of the relevant historical context in determining just cause? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a motion for a stay of execution pending a counter-claim, cross-claim and third party claim valid? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the relevant factors for determining an award in the context of matrimonial home matter? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for “beneficial” in the context of access? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the proper remedy for unjust enrichment in the context of a claim for constructive trust? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review in the context of a spouse's claim for spousal support? (Ontario, Canada)
