What is the test for interpretation of section 78(1) and paragraph 87(d)?

Canada (Federal), Canada

The following excerpt is from Canada v. Dow Chemical Canada Inc., 2008 FCA 231 (CanLII):

The parties are agreed that the interpretation of subsection 78(1) and paragraph 87(7)(d) raises questions of law which stand to be reviewed on a standard of correctness (Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235 at paras. 33 and 36).

Other Questions


How have the courts interpreted section 56(2) of the Income Tax Code in the context of Section 56(1) and Section 5(2)? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
How has the Court interpreted the principle of "due process" in the context of section 402(d)(8) of the Child Support Benefits Act? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the scope of a section 2(2) of the Human Rights Act, section 3(4) and section 4(5) of The Queen’s Speech to the House of Representatives on the issue of same sex discrimination? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the test for subsection 2(3) of the Criminal Code of Canada section 5(6) of Section 7(2) of section 6(3)? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
How has section 1058 of the Federal Tax Code been interpreted in the context of Section 1058? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted federal legislation in the context of constitutional interpretation? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing a prima facie violation of the fair cross-section section of the sixth amendment? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the meaning of Section 530(5) of the Tax Code? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the meaning of Section 1964(c) of the RICO Act? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the result of a reviewable error in a visa officer's interpretation of paragraph 20(1.1)(a) of the Regulations Regulations? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
X



Whitelogo nobg 300dpi sm


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."


Trusted by top litigators from across North America.