What is the test for interpretation of section 78(1) and paragraph 87(d)?

Canada (Federal), Canada

The following excerpt is from Canada v. Dow Chemical Canada Inc., 2008 FCA 231 (CanLII):

The parties are agreed that the interpretation of subsection 78(1) and paragraph 87(7)(d) raises questions of law which stand to be reviewed on a standard of correctness (Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235 at paras. 33 and 36).

Other Questions

What is the test for overturning a chambers judge's finding that a section of statutory interpretation of the Statutory Interpretation of Section 5(1) of the Criminal Code applies to a person who is not a party to the legislation? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a deeming provision under section 87(7)(d) of the Financial Conduct Authority apply to an amalgamated corporation? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Can a municipality impose a variable permit fee under section 930(1)(d) of the Regulations Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has section 1 of the Interpretation Act, 1889, been interpreted? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a complaint be dismissed pursuant to section 27(1)(d)(ii) of the Criminal Code? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted section 56(2) of the Income Tax Code in the context of Section 56(1) and Section 5(2)? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Is section 15(1) of the BC Human Rights Act, section 2(b)(ii) of which makes distinctions between individuals and groups so long as they are not discriminatory? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does section 128 of the BC Strata Corporation Act, s. 128(1) of the Statutory Review of Strata Plan Amendments, or does the section 128(2) apply to residential or non-residential members of the corporation? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of section 29(1) of the Criminal Code Act, section 46 of the Civil Rights Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the interpretation of s. 93(1)(a)(ii) of the BCSC 2455 of the Statutory Regulation of Motor Vehicles apply in the context of a limitation in the meaning of the limitation in s.93(1)? (British Columbia, Canada)