The trial judge applied the correct legal principles. Even in custody cases, the ordinary rule is that costs are in the cause: see rule 56A.26; M.(J.M.) v. M.(K.A.A.), 2005 NLCA 64, 251 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 349, at paras. 37-38; and Snelgrove v. Butler, 2011 NLTD(F) 6, 308 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 168, at para. 25. It is clear that there is not a “no costs” presumption in custody cases.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.