Mother relied on the case of Zinyama-Mubili v. Mubili, 2010 ONSC 3928 CarswellOnt 4935 for the proposition that videos ought not to be admitted into evidence where there is evidence that the videos have been selectively edited in such a way as to suit the purposes of the party taking those videos. I agree that if that if there was evidence of selective editing, or if the videos were otherwise a misrepresentation of what actually occurred, the court will be reluctant to admit them into evidence. However, no such evidence exists in this case.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.