What are the reasons of a trial judge's failure to state that they have a reasonable doubt?

Prince Edward Island, Canada


The following excerpt is from R. v. Jeffrey Lea Hogg, 2013 PECA 11 (CanLII):

If the answers to these questions are affirmative, the reasons are not deficient, notwithstanding lack of detail and notwithstanding the fact that they are less than ideal. The trial judge should not be found to have erred in law for failing to describe every consideration leading to a finding of credibility, or to the conclusion of guilt or innocence. Nor should error of law be found because the trial judge has failed to reconcile every frailty in the evidence or allude to every relevant principle of law. Reasonable inferences need not be spelled out. For example if, in a case that turns on credibility, a trial judge explains that he or she has rejected the accused's evidence, but fails to state that he or she has a reasonable doubt, this does not constitute an error of law; in such a case the conviction itself raises an inference that the accused's evidence failed to raise a reasonable doubt. Finally, appellate courts must guard against simply sifting through the record and substituting their own analysis of the evidence for that of the trial judge because the reasons do not comply with their idea of ideal reasons. As was established in Harper v. The Queen, 1982 CanLII 11 (SCC), [1982] 1 S.C.R. 2, at p. 14, "[a]n appellate tribunal has neither the duty nor the right to reassess evidence at trial for the purpose of determining guilt or innocence... . Where the record, including the reasons for judgment, discloses a lack of appreciation of relevant evidence and more particularly the complete disregard of such evidence, then it falls upon the reviewing tribunal to intercede."

Other Questions


What is the appeal from a judge of the trial division in a small claims matter? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
When a motion judge exercises her new fact-finding powers under Rule 20.04(2.04) and determines whether there is a genuine issue requiring trial, is it deference? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
What is the test for replacing an opinion of a trial judge with one of its own? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
Does a trial judge have an obligation to restrict contact with one parent? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
How have the courts treated testimony that the respondent mother gave to a trial judge that she would return to Canada for the sake of the children? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
What are the findings of a motion judge's reasons for judgment on costs? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
Is there any case law where a series of offers were exchanged over 20 months prior to trial with the last offer being made 4 calendar days before trial commenced? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
What is the test for a court of appeal to review the findings of a trial judge's determinations on questions of law? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
What is the test for determining liability for failure to obtain informed consent in a medical malpractice case? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on open access to courts? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.