What is the test for finding that the accused has committed similar acts to the accused?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from R. v. Johnson, 2010 ONCA 646 (CanLII):

The trial judge must also determine whether there is some evidentiary link between the similar acts and the accused. Where there is no evidence connecting the accused to the similar fact evidence itself, the evidence is irrelevant and inadmissible: Sweitzer v. The Queen, 1982 CanLII 23 (SCC), [1982] 1 S.C.R. 949, at p. 954.

Other Questions


What is the consequence of a finding that a decision in a similar case must result in similar sanctions? (Ontario, Canada)
When will the court make a finding of fact or finding of not finding fact in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for committing an accused to stand trial at a preliminary hearing? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review for findings of fact in a motion to appeal against a finding of unlawful imprisonment? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a preliminary inquiry judge commit an accused to trial where there is no evidence on the essential element of the charge? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for appealing on the ground of appeal against a finding that a trial judge committed a palpable and overriding error? (Ontario, Canada)
Can an appellate court substitute a trial judge’s findings of fact or mixed findings of law with its own? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a finding of fact made on an interlocutory finding in a separate judicial proceeding engage in issue estoppel in a subsequent proceeding? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the legal test for overturning a finding of fact or finding of law? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the sentence of the accused who pleaded guilty to counselling to commit kidnapping and extortion need to be concurrent with the offence of extortion? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.