What is the test for striking a claim under the tort of conspiracy?

Ontario, Canada

The following excerpt is from Leitch v. Novac, 2019 ONSC 794 (CanLII):

The Court of Appeal held that the trial judge did not err in striking the claim based on the principles in Frame v. Smith. The court began by citing the principles in Canada Cement with respect to the scope of the tort of conspiracy. The court also discussed problems with the tort of conspiracy including the fact that the tort of conspiracy “may have lost much of its usefulness in our commercial world, and survives in our law as an anomaly.”[66]

Other Questions

What is the test for a claim for an easement based on prescription under limitation statute or under the doctrine of lost grant? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for striking a claim or portion of a claim that discloses no reasonable cause of action? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a claim under a contract predating a collective agreement have jurisdiction over the claim? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there a conspiracy or intimidation tort claim? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a defamation claim be sustained in conspiracy? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the limitation period for a claim brought under the Warsaw Convention? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a claim under a grantor's name be repudiated? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for discovering a claim under the Limitations Act? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for setting aside a registrar’s order dismissing a claim under Rule 77.08? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for a motion to strike a statement of claim under Rule 21.01? (Ontario, Canada)

There are no other similar questions at this time.