What is the test for a plea of non est factum under the principle of negligence?

Saskatchewan, Canada


The following excerpt is from Co-operative Trust Company of Canada v. Receveur, Hansen, Paslowski and Mahon, 1985 CanLII 2376 (SK CA):

He then dealt with the exception arising under the principle of non est factum and stated: “An anxious consideration of all the authorities referred to by counsel and in the courts below has brought me to the conclusion that, insofar, as Carlisle v. Bragg decides that the rule that negligence excludes a plea of non est factum is limited to the case of negotiable instruments and does not extend to a deed such as the one before us, we should refuse to follow it.”

Other Questions


Is an auditor liable for negligence of omission or negligence of commission? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What are the principles enunciated in the principles of the above? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have the trustees been found to be negligent in negligence in a case involving an infant plaintiff? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What are the elements of actionable negligence? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the burden of proving negligence against a defendant in a motor vehicle accident case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have courts interpreted a plea of non est factum? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What are the principles to be applied in interpreting a will? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for gross negligence in a medical malpractice case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the definition of “escape” under the principle of Rylands v Fletcher? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the case law applying the best interests principle? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.