Is there a triable defence against liability for loss of income?

New Brunswick, Canada


The following excerpt is from McDonald v. Martin, 2013 NBQB 199 (CanLII):

Liability for the accident has been admitted, but liability for damages such as ongoing loss of income has not been admitted. This is similar to the facts in Logue v. Holt, [2004] N.B.J., wherein liability for the accident was admitted, but not for ongoing damages for loss of income. Mr. Justice Grant found that a claim for advance payment for lost wages could not be ordered because “there is a triable defence”. He stated that a further advance could “do damage to the defence”.

Other Questions


What is the defence of self-defence? (New Brunswick, Canada)
When will a defence counsel ask the complainant a few general questions about their sex practices that involve the complainant's personal security or privacy? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the test for the defence of duress? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the test for the defence of provocation in a sexual assault case? (New Brunswick, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court impute income for the purposes of determining child support? (New Brunswick, Canada)
Is the petitioner entitled to benefit from the increased income of the respondent post-separation? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What are the elements of the common law defence of fair comment? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the test for liability in a stairway case? (New Brunswick, Canada)
In what circumstances will a spouse not receive spousal support from her husband's increased income? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the test for negligence in the conduct of a defence? (New Brunswick, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.