Is a plaintiff entitled to a new trial, limited to the question of damages?
Saskatchewan, Canada
The following excerpt is from Heitner v. Gillstrom, 1930 CanLII 155 (SK CA):
The plaintiff, in my opinion, is entitled to a new trial, limited to the question of the assessment of damages: Rule 43 of the Rules of the Court of Appeal; English Marginal Rule 557; Hockley v. G.T. Ry. (1905) 10 O.L.R. 363.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can a plaintiff recover damages for damages caused by a herd of large cattle that were running loose on a highway? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What are the circumstances in which a judge has found that a plaintiff is entitled to sue for damages in the absence of a jury? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to general damages where passing off has been established? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will the trial judge allow the parents of a plaintiff to participate in the trial? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
When a plaintiff is found crushed to death by machinery that it was his duty to start, is he entitled to recover damages? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will a plaintiff be indemnified for any damage caused to a plaintiff’s storage facility by a lighter man? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to a punitive damages award? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In a criminal case, in what circumstances will a prosecutor be able to question a witness in question? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to the highest price of stocks acquired in the interim? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to a registered ownership of a mortgage? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
