What is the burden of establishing that shared use of the matrimonial home with the respondent is a "practical impossibility"?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Boxer v. Boxer, 2013 BCSC 1590 (CanLII):
The parties agree that the claimant has the burden of establishing that shared use of the matrimonial home with the respondent is a “practical impossibility” (Rinta v. Rinta, [1980] B.C.J. No. 1389, at para. 3).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the fact that the respondent did not expect the respondent to pay for the domestic services provided by the Respondent have any impact on an unjust enrichment claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a long-established and invariable practice of chiropractor practice be changed if the environment in which it exists changes? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of establishing that a claimant’s claim will not be defeated if the Respondent's property is disposed of? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the Respondent Respondent responded to an application for a change in parenting time? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a respondent respond to an application with a sur-reply responding to new issues raised in reply? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of establishing that any one of the conditions is satisfied? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of a 1972 matrimonial home agreement on the equalization of equal shares? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of establishing that a complaint has no reasonable prospect of success? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of establishing that a complainant has a reasonable chance of success in her claim of sexual assault? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of establishing an evidentiary basis for imputation of income? (British Columbia, Canada)
