Does the trial judge change his position when recalling the jury for further instructions?
Saskatchewan, Canada
The following excerpt is from R. v. Hay, 1982 CanLII 2516 (SK CA):
In the instant case the trial judge did modify the position which he had taken when he recalled the jury for further instructions. He did not however go far enough to adequately explain to the jury that the appellant was entitled to have the explanatory statements given by him to the police officers assessed accordingly to the principle set out in Regina v. Risby, supra.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In what circumstances will the court interfere with the chambers judge or trial judge on an interim maintenance order? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will the trial judge allow the parents of a plaintiff to participate in the trial? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for changing a jury trial to a different jury trial? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does the trial judge’s spousal support decision not to change the order, even if the husband's income falls if he decides to retire or work less? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does the trial judge err in allowing the respondent to introduce parol evidence? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the standard of proof required for a learned trial judge to prove a claim of false imprisonment? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the legal test for intervenation by the Court of Appeal in findings of fact by a trial judge? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How has the jury been instructed in a sexual assault trial to consider corroboration evidence? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What are the grounds of appeal against the finding that a learned trial judge erred in fact and law in ruling that the force used was substantial? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What are the consequences of a trial judge’s failure to spell out every consideration leading to a finding of credibility? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
