The issue on this motion is whether the deemed admissions were inadvertent. The test for leave to withdraw and admission is not simply to have the party in default, or its lawyer, say the default occurred because of inadvertence. If that is all that is required, then the time limits mean nothing. There must be some explanation as to what went procedurally awry in the solicitor’s office that resulted in the failure to respond: Falco v. P.V. & V. Insurance Centre, [2007] I.L.R. I-4639 (S.C.), at para. 19.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.