How have the courts interpreted the meaning of a voluntary payment in a personal injury case?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Langley v. Van Allen and Co., 1901 CanLII 33 (ON CA):

In Morgan v. Palmer (1824), 2 B. & C. 729, Abbott, C.J., said: “It has been well argued that the payment having been voluntary it cannot be recovered back in an action for money had and received. I agree that such a consequence would have followed had the parties been on equal terms. But if one party has the power of saying to the other, ‘That which you require shall not be done except upon the conditions which I choose to impose,’ no person can contend that they stood upon anything like an equal footing.”

Other Questions


How have the courts in Canada dealt with the issue of personal injury cases involving personal injury claims? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on personal injury representation in personal injury cases? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the legal test for disbursements of personal injury compensation in personal injury cases? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the principle of waiver in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts interpreted a limitation or exclusion of liability clause in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a motion to add as parties to a personal injury action for personal injury costs granted? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for a judge to order personal costs against counsel in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court consider whether or not to grant a surety in a personal injury case where there is a high risk of flight? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the relevant case law for giving evidence from a third party witness in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the options available to the court for consideration in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.