The defendant argues that public officials should not be called away from their duties unnecessarily. In support of this submission, it cites Marshall v. Kirby, [1977] O.J. No. 1463, 5 C.P.C. 23 (H.C.J.). In that case, the court acknowledged that the public has an interest in public officers remaining at or near their place of duty, which was Ottawa. The case pre-dates the amendment of the rule. However, on the facts of that case, the court held it was a relevant but not determinative factor in light of other factors and ordered the trial to take place in Toronto.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.