Does the doctrine of res judicata apply in the context of retroactive and ongoing spousal support?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from CAG v SG, 2012 ABQB 529 (CanLII):

The recent decision of Mr. Justice Graesser in Woito v. Lajoie, 2012 ABQB 103, casts some doubt upon my view of the non‑application of the doctrine of res judicata in this situation. That case involved an application by the husband to cancel arrears of spousal support and to set ongoing support at nil. A decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice on April 1, 2009 had resulted in retroactive and ongoing spousal support.

Other Questions


When considering retroactive spousal support for the purposes of child support, is the issue of notice, delay and misconduct relevant? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the effect of retroactive spousal support on the distribution of matrimonial property? (Alberta, Canada)
How has the court considered the relationship between child support and spousal support? (Alberta, Canada)
How is spousal support determined in the context of the Divorce Act? (Alberta, Canada)
When will a court award retroactive retroactive child support for a child who has been expelled from school for the past year? (Alberta, Canada)
Does remarriage of a divorced spouse entitled to court-ordered support from a former spouse automatically justify or discharge a subsisting order for spousal and child support? (Alberta, Canada)
Is child support for the purposes of spousal support appropriate? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for division of matrimonial property in the context of spousal support? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for applying the doctrine of jurisdiction in the context of sexual assault cases? (Alberta, Canada)
How does the doctrine of merger apply in the context of real estate transactions? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.