What is the test for determining whether there has been enrichment or deprivation between the parties?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Conquergood v Dalfort, 2007 BCSC 1556 (CanLII):

In Toth v. de Frias (1996) 78 B.C.A.C. 34 the British Columbia Court of Appeal said that in determining whether there has been an enrichment and a corresponding deprivation, the court should consider the totality of what passed between the parties.

Other Questions


What is the test for determining whether there has been enrichment and a corresponding deprivation? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a judge to consider the relative balance of convenience between the parties in determining whether there is an interest in land? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether there was connivance between the parties in the context of the definition of a party to a marriage contract? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether there was an unequal bargaining power between the two parties? (British Columbia, Canada)
If there is enrichment and a corresponding deprivation, does the court have to determine whether there was a juristic reason? (British Columbia, Canada)
What factors will the court consider when determining the division of assets between the parties in a long-term marriage where there was a long term marriage? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the nature of the relationship between the parties in determining whether a fiduciary duty exists? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the equitable remedy of unjust enrichment when there is an agreement between the parties? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether there is a causal link between previous injuries and subsequent injuries? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether there is a causal connection between a breach of duty and damage? (Manitoba, Canada)