I find, as the court did in R v. MacDonald, above, at para 25 that, in this situation, "both evils are uncertain". I am therefore left with a reasonable doubt on the question of whether her response was disproportionate. Therefore, she is not barred from relying on the defence of necessity on the basis that the harm caused by her unlawful act was clearly greater than the harm she sought to avoid. Contributory fault
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.