As confirmed in Pezim v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Brokers), 1994 CanLII 103 (SCC), [1994] 2 S.C.R. 557 at 598-99, in such appeal, the court should undertake a pragmatic and functional analysis to determine the standard of review. It is within such analysis that the court shall determine on the spectrum of deference, beginning with correctness at one end and patent unreasonableness at the other end, whether the determination of the committee withstands judicial scrutiny.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.