One of the arguments asserted by the appellant in Pekarek v. Manufacturers Life Insurance Company, 2006 BCCA 250 (CanLII), was that the trial judge had misstated the legal test for determining whether there had been a “clear and unequivocal” denial of benefits and suggested that there was an obligation on the insurer to provide actual notice that the limitation period was commencing to run.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.