A tenant was convicted of occupying without a permit without proof that he conducted business where the premises were intended for use as a woodworking business. Montreal v. Kleinveld, cited earlier. The court considered several definitions of occupancy and concluded that although the premises had apparently actually been used for their intended purpose on one occasion, that was, in fact, not an essential element of occupation under that Act.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.