To similar effect is the trial decision in Kovacova v. Ray, [1998] B.C.J. No. 3309 (S.C.). There, the court concluded that the grass area, or verge, alongside a road was not an improvement for the use of pedestrians. Counsel for the plaintiff seeks to distinguish these cases on the basis that there was no sidewalk at all in either case, only a boulevard or grassy area.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.