The Court of Appeal in Johnson v. Wunderlich applied an administration of justice rationale: If the respondent [Insurer] is removed from the action at this time it will not be bound by a judgement obtained against the alleged tortfeasors – because the action against them is uncontested. Accordingly, the whole matter of liability and damages might have to be re-litigated in a subsequent action against the respondent on the judgment. This multiplicity of proceedings would be completely unnecessary.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.