The patently unreasonable test is a very strict test which accords the highest degree of deference to the decision of the tribunal. The court can only intervene where there is no evidence whatsoever to support the findings made by the decision maker (Hale v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2004 BCSC 1358 at para. 20). Therefore, this court must consider whether there was evidence to support the findings made by the Superintendent.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.