The Court of Appeal in Filipchuk v. Ladouceur, 2001 ABCA 26 provided two possible interpretation of Rule 244.1 which suggests that the rule is not totally automatic or final:– (a) the first is that an action has languished for five years without an agreement between the parties will be struck upon application of an adverse party. (b) the second interpretation is that a party can revive the five year period even after its expiration by taking a material step, if that step is taken prior to the filing of the motion to strike under 244.1.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.