Is Rule 244.1 automatic or final?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Underwood v. Sturgeon County, 2005 ABQB 713 (CanLII):

The Court of Appeal in Filipchuk v. Ladouceur, 2001 ABCA 26 provided two possible interpretation of Rule 244.1 which suggests that the rule is not totally automatic or final:– (a) the first is that an action has languished for five years without an agreement between the parties will be struck upon application of an adverse party. (b) the second interpretation is that a party can revive the five year period even after its expiration by taking a material step, if that step is taken prior to the filing of the motion to strike under 244.1.

Other Questions


What are the principles of consistency, autonomy, finality and the value of settlement? (Alberta, Canada)
Does remarriage of a divorced spouse entitled to court-ordered support from a former spouse automatically justify or discharge a subsisting order for spousal and child support? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a replevin order be granted in a conditional sale situation where ownership of the property does not pass to the purchaser until the final installment payment has been made? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the legal test used to lift the automatic stay of a motion in a personal injury? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will final orders for matrimonial property division be made in a chambers or special chambers hearing? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the traditional approach to vary a final judgment or order? (Alberta, Canada)
What factors must the reviewing court consider in determining whether a decision is final or subject to appeal? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will a renunciation become final? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a final order of foreclosure be reopened? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the evidence that supports the Statement of Claim? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.