Another example is provided in deVerteuil v. deVerteuil (1980), 13 F.L.D. 123 (B.C.). In that case the owning spouse had lost most of his assets after the separation. The court declined to set the valuation date as the date of separation but it appears that the reason for the decision was that all the family assets had, in fact, been dissipated by the date of trial. There was nothing left to apportion.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.