In Wheeler-Clarke v. Clarke, 2009 BCSC 1421, the court, taking into account the husband’s greater contribution to the purchase of the matrimonial home, the relatively short marriage, and the husband’s need to become and remain economically self-sufficient, concluded that under s. 65 an unequal division of the family home in favour of the husband was warranted. Although the husband had also paid most of the expenses for maintaining the family home, the court applied Zaurrini and concluded this factor was offset by his rent-free occupancy of the home and receipt of rental income.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexsei.com.