Does a plaintiff have to prove that he was not involved in the damage caused to his car by vandals?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Robinson v. Insurance Corp. Of British Columbia, 1999 CanLII 6152 (BC SC):

I refer also to the comments of Spencer J. in Bevacqua v. Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, [1998] B.C.J. No. 993, (April 29, 1998) where the defendant's primary position was that the plaintiff had made a wilfully false statement to the effect that he did not know the persons who had vandalized his vehicle. His Lordship noted that vandalism does not occur where the owner is directly or indirectly involved in wilfully damaging his vehicle and therefore accepted that it was incumbent upon the plaintiff to prove on a balance of probabilities that he was not involved in the damage to his car.

Other Questions


Is a plaintiff entitled to recover damages from a defendant for damage caused to his back? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a strata to prove negligence against a party who causes damage to its property? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a plaintiff have to prove that the accident caused or contributed to their degenerative changes? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a strata recover damages from a property owner who causes damage to common property or strata lot? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the range of damages for damages awarded to a plaintiff who was injured in a dispute with her neighbour over noise and/or nuisance? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a defendant to prove that a plaintiff has not mitigated their damages? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff liable for any additional damage caused by a crumbling skull? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to be treated as a thin-skulled plaintiff for the purpose of damage assessment? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can knowledge of a cause of cause be used as grounds for cause of dismissal? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for adding plaintiffs to a proposed class action where the named and proposed representative plaintiff has no legitimate cause of action? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.