What is the current state of the law on the admissibility of new evidence in a judicial review?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Morse v Crystal River Court Ltd., 2021 BCSC 1868 (CanLII):
In Air Canada v. British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal), 2018 BCCA 387, our Court of Appeal rejected a categorical approach to the admissibility of new evidence on judicial review and instead set out the following principled approach:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the current state of the law on new evidence in a judicial review? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on admitting fresh evidence on a judicial review? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on judicial review of the decisions of municipal councils? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the common law rule with regard to admission of evidence on judicial reviews? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on the admission of assessments as evidence of value in a family law case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the current state of the law in Canada when it comes to rationalizing the subjective evidence of the parties' intentions with objective evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the judicial review approach used by a court engaged in judicial review? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the current state of the language of judicial review in a civil law context? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is affidavit evidence from a decision maker admissible on judicial review? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the standards of review applicable to a judicial review of a decision made under the Rules of Review Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
