Does a hope for improved communication between the parties after litigation is over not provide a sufficient basis for joint custody?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Vicars v. Bessey, 2009 ONCJ 158 (CanLII):

[27] The Court of Appeal has also made clear that, where there is no evidence of effective communication between the parents, a hope for improved communication between the parties once the litigation is over does not provide a sufficient basis for ordering joint custody. See Kaplanis v. Kaplanis, supra.

Other Questions


Does a statement by one party that there is an inability to communicate with the other party preclude a joint custody order? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for sufficient communication between a party and party? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a crown attorney acting for the applicant in a litigation between parties not providing a service to the opposing party? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a court award costs to a party who was more successful on an overall global basis than the other party on a global basis? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a comment made by a party to a party’s communications entitled to be impugned as a matter of public interest? (Ontario, Canada)
When parties have joint custody of a child, can the child attend English-only primary school? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a litigation guardian required to approve a partial settlement that includes payment of 15% plus party and party costs to solicitors? (Ontario, Canada)
When a joint contribution is matched and fair, when the contributions of the parties are matched, is one party required to pay back the value of the benefit received? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a court award costs to a party who was more successful on an overall global basis than the other party? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the impact of a party’s email to the opposing party of a parenting motion for custody of the children? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.