How have courts treated evidence in a rear-end collision case?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Wright v. Mistry, 2017 BCSC 239 (CanLII):

The Court of Appeal addressed this in Singleton v. Morris, 2010 BCCA 48, emphasizing that a rear-end collision is merely evidence, for which plaintiff and defendant can offer different explanations:

Other Questions


How have the courts treated evidence in a sexual assault case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the case law in favour of the Court of Appeal in the case of the Supreme Court of Canada's most senior judge in the matter of personal injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the courts in Australia treated prior misconduct evidence in a sexual assault case? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts treated wildlife collision cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
In an aboriginal rights and title case, how have the courts considered expert evidence in aboriginal cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law or case law that would require the court to conduct a minute analysis of a joint bank account? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court accept evidence that the traffic light was in the late yellow stage or all red stage at the time the collision occurred? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the court in Salaam dealt with a motor vehicle collision case? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law where a party who has not made full disclosure to a court has to prove to the court that there has been full disclosure? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the case law on the validity of evidence in a medical malpractice case? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.