Is there any case law in which the learned Law Lords have been found to be obiter?
Saskatchewan, Canada
The following excerpt is from Smart v. Livett, 1950 CanLII 170 (SK CA):
Realizing the great importance of the last-mentioned case on the present, counsel for the defendants contends that the statements of the learned Law Lords were obiter. With every deference I do not think that they are obiter, as that term was defined by this court in Davidner v. Schuster; Riesenberg v. Schuster 1935 CanLII 182 (SK CA), [1936] 1 WWR 45.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is there any case law where the learned trial judge found there was no evidence of intent to defraud? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
On what grounds can a learned trial judge be found to have coercive or otherwise in his remarks to the jury? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the difference between the opinion of the law Lords and the opinions of the other law Lords? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will a defendant be found liable in a trespass action? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the standard of proof required for a learned trial judge to prove a claim of false imprisonment? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is there any case law where a jury found that a pedestrian crossing was in a thickly peopled area? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
On what basis can the dental surgeon be found jointly responsible for the escape of blood into the lungs? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for overturning a conviction of sexual assault against a man who was found guilty of the same offence by a different judge? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the effect of a learned trial judge's finding that two drivers were not at fault in a motor vehicle accident? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for a commercial agent to be found guilty of larceny as a bailee? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
