How have courts dealt with the issue of personal injury benefits?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Monks v. ING Insurance Co. of Canada, 2005 CanLII 21689 (ON SC):

Mr. Justice Belch dealt partly with this issue: d’Entremont v. Smallwood, [1999] O.J. No. 4567 (Sup. Ct. Just.) [QL]. This case was not really about statutory benefits, but was rather an action brought by the victim of an automobile accident, who became paraplegic as a result of the accident, against the estate of another driver who died in the accident, and against the tavern where the defendant driver had become intoxicated prior to driving his car and causing the accident.

Other Questions


How have the courts in Canada dealt with the issue of personal injury cases involving personal injury claims? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts dealt with the issue of home ownership issues in personal injury cases? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts dealt with the issue of personal injury claims? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts dealt with the issue of negligence in the context of personal injury cases? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts dealt with the issue of equitable trust in a personal injury application? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts dealt with the issue of personal injury cases? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the legal test for disbursements of personal injury compensation in personal injury cases? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts dealt with the contradictory nature of affidavits in a personal injury action? (Ontario, Canada)
If the parties cannot agree on the issue of costs in a personal injury action, can the parties make written submissions to the Respondent to the Application to the Court of Appeal? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a motion to add as parties to a personal injury action for personal injury costs granted? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.