In this case, there is what has been described as a “head on” conflict in the evidence that goes directly to the foundation of the plaintiff’s case, the resolution of which requires findings of credibility to be made. In such a case the court must proceed with caution: Charest v. Pouch, 2011 BCSC 1165, at paras. 54-61.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.