Can a witness be compelled to leave the witness stand and inform himself on matters which he had no knowledge?

Saskatchewan, Canada


The following excerpt is from Bondar v. Usinovitch, 1918 CanLII 180 (SK QB):

It is contended on behalf of the appellant that, under the wording of this rule, as a party giving evidence at the trial would not be compelled to leave the witness stand and inform himself on matters of which he had no knowledge, likewise he should not be required to do so in an examination for discovery. In support of this contention the case of Brydon Jack v. Vancouver Printing Co., 16 B.C.R. 55 ; 16 W.L.R. 262, is referred to.

Other Questions


What is the obligation of a person who is discovered during a medical examination to inform himself on all matters material to the issues? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a plaintiff compel the attendance of two witnesses at trial? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for giving an accused sufficient information to be able to stand trial? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does the fact that a mortgagee is not in possession of the mortgagee's property matter matter? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does the issue of informed consent by an accused under s.8 of the Charter apply? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for knowledge of an individual to have known of an unusual danger? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How do courts determine whether a matter arises out of a collective agreement? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on full disclosure and informed consent? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a party to a consent judgment be made against a property that was to stand as security for the equalization payment? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In a criminal case, in what circumstances will a prosecutor be able to question a witness in question? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.