Once a finding of mootness has been made, the court must determine whether to exercise its discretion to hear the appeal. The court must consider whether there are collateral consequences to the parties based on the outcome of the issue such that it ought to be heard, such as when criminal proceedings are ongoing and relate directly to the questions sought to be determined on appeal. The court must consider the concern for judicial economy. There is a need to ration scarce judicial resources to hear those matters which involve a live controversy between the parties. In addition, the court must be sensitive to its adjudicative role. Pronouncing judgments in the absence of any real dispute affecting the parties’ rights may be viewed as an intrusion into the role of the legislature. Reference: Borowski v. Canada, supra
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.