Similarly, in Germain v. Brar, 2010 ABQB 530, at para. 50, the court held that the claimants would have suffered considerable inconvenience because in order to avoid driving over some portion of the servient tenement and to access the garage, they would have had to re-structure and renovate the house and retaining wall. In English v. Wood, [1981] N.S.J. No. 424, 1981 CarswellNS 261 (S.C.T.D.), the court found an implied easement even though the driveway in question could be moved 13 feet to the north.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.