Is there any case law where the words "trespass or trespass" are held to imply more than mere trespass or civil wrong?
Saskatchewan, Canada
The following excerpt is from R. v. Gibson, 1976 CanLII 953 (SK QB):
On the other hand, these words were held to imply more than mere trespass or civil wrong in Abbott v. Pulbrooke, [1947], S.A.S.R. 57, a decision of Mayo J. in the same court The full court is the higher court and, in any event, I much prefer its reasoning.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for interpretation of the words “to be construed in one sense only” in the words of a statute? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the meaning of the words "substantially the same" in the English Rules of Civil Procedure? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does the word “out of” or “in the course” apply to a claim for wrongful dismissal? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for a plaintiff to succeed in an action for trespass and trespass? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for admissibility of testimony by a plaintiff in a civil case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does the word “testamentary expense” include estate duty on personal property? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the meaning of the word “surviving”? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a defendant plead to an amendment to the Rules of Civil Procedure? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will a defendant be found liable in a trespass action? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for admissible in an action for words spoken or written? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
