What is the test for interlocutory application in an action made either before or after final judgment?

Saskatchewan, Canada


The following excerpt is from Security Lumber Company, Ltd. v. Leibrand and Foil, 1923 CanLII 183 (SK CA):

To adopt this language to the case at bar, I would say that we have here not an application in an action made either before or after final judgment and which might therefore be interlocutory (Blakey v. Latham, 43 Ch. D. 23), but a proceeding “the object of which as a matter of substance” is to dispose of the rights of the parties at trial.

Other Questions


Can an application be made for an extension of time on an application to extend the time on which the application is granted? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is an interlocutory order that directs how the declarations of right are to be worked out in the context of a final judgment? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for an application for summary judgment based on three bills of exchange? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does a common law procedure act, 1854, ch. 125, which enacted that a plaintiff is not entitled to any costs in an action commenced after the action was commenced? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for enforcing a foreign judgment in an action in personam? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What are the implications of the new Queen’s Bench Rules for summary judgment applications? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What documents are properly to be considered on an application to strike out a statement of claim on the grounds that it discloses no reasonable cause of action? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
If a vendor takes a personal judgment against a plaintiff, and then withdraws the execution of the contract, what is the effect of the judgment against the vendor? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a plaintiff in a personal injury action commence a second action for damages arising out of the same circumstances? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the difference between a discharge application and the discharge application? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.