In conducting the required comparison between an offer to settle and the outcome at trial, the court “is not required to examine each term of the offer as compared to the terms of the order and weigh with microscopic precision the equivalence of the terms:” Chomos v. Hamilton, 2016 ONSC 6232, 82 R.F.L. (7th) 395, at para. 19. Instead, what “is required is a general assessment of the overall comparability of the offer as contrasted with the order:” Chomos v. Hamilton, at para. 19.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.