What is the test for bias in the context of a superintendent of motor vehicles?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Yurik v. Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, 2004 BCSC 1530 (CanLII):

I have considered the decision of the court in Feddersen v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2003 BCSC 208. It is useful because it sets out the legal principles I must apply in dealing with the issue of bias. It is however distinguishable on its facts. CONCLUSION

Other Questions


What is the legal test for using the word "superintendent of Motor Vehicles" in a motor vehicle application? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for judicial review of a decision by a Superintendent of Motor Vehicles under s. 215.5 of the Motor Vehicle Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between a motor vehicle accident and a subsequent motor vehicle collision? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a motor vehicle prohibition be confirmed on the basis that the petitioner did not intend to put his vehicle in motion when he got in the vehicle? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a motor vehicle accident involving a stolen vehicle, can the driver of the stolen vehicle be held liable for damages? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a motor vehicle insurance policy deductible under s. 25 of the BC Motor Vehicle Insurance Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for reasonableness in the context of a superintendent of motor vehicles review? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the evidence in the context of a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of reasonableness of a judicial review of a decision made by a Superintendent of Motor Vehicles? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the meaning of "fons et origo mali" in the context of a motor vehicle collision case? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.