What authorities have inferred the right to counsel in long-term criminal cases?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from R. v. Rain, 1998 ABCA 315 (CanLII):
As noted above, the authorities which have inferred the right to counsel have involved serious and complex offences in lengthy trials. In Rowbotham, the court considered the assistance of counsel necessary when the accused faced charges as part of a year-long trial for conspiracy to import narcotics. In Panacui v. Legal Aid Society of Alberta, the accused faced numerous charges including kidnapping, murder, robbery, escape from lawful custody and firearms offences.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When an individual is informed of his right to counsel, does a reasonable delay in implementing this right? (Alberta, Canada)
How have decisions by the Chief Commissioner of Human Rights and Human Rights have been treated in the context of discrimination cases? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for ineffectiveness of counsel in a criminal case? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the current state of the law in the context of access to counsel in a criminal case? (Alberta, Canada)
Is there any case law or case law in which a defence counsel has been found to have made out deficiencies in the credibility assessment? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the case law on case-by-case privilege? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the range of general and pecuniary damages for discrimination against an employer in a human rights case? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for self-serving statements in a criminal case? (Alberta, Canada)
What are the implications of leadings cases on the mobility rights of custodial parents? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the case law in the United States when it comes to the case of a lay-man who is not qualified to stand trial? (Alberta, Canada)
